🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have scraped millions of songs from Spotify and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the seeming leak could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for data to train their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as performer and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow technology firms to “train on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to let AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.